The recent post on how the administration at Daniel Pearl Magnet High School suspended a student media adviser for not censoring the students needs a couple updates.
(Just as a quick recap: veteran educator, adviser and former journalist Adriana Chavira was told she had to remove the name of a librarian from a story the students ran last semester about COVID. When she declined, based on how California Law, the First Amendment and common sense work, she was hit with a three-day suspension.)
The folks at the Daniel Pearl Foundation are aware of the situation and working to craft a response. Tamara Pearl was nice enough to get back to me to let me know that her family is working with the L.A. Press Club to craft a statement that will be released soon. (We’ll post it here when she sends it our way.) She also noted that the SPLC is planning a press release later today on the situation. (We’ll update with that, too.)
In addition, I wrote a calm, reasoned email to the principal, Armen Petrossian, which asked him to reexamine this situation.
In truth, I desperately just wanted to do this:
(If you care to share your displeasure over this situation with Petrossian, here’s the staff page where you can find his info. Just click and it’ll take you to a form.)
It’s important to note this isn’t the only case of adults stomping all over the rights of students happening these days. Northwest High School in Nebraska recently killed its student newspaper after the administrators realized they couldn’t control the content.
The crime these students committed? Running content that supported their LGBTQ classmates in a factual and fair manner.
If you want the quote of the day from someone who just doesn’t get how the media is supposed to work, here’s the school board’s VP:
Northwest Public Schools board Vice President Zach Mader said that in the past, “I do think there have been talks of doing away with our news if we were not going to be able to control content that we saw (as) inappropriate.”
He cautiously explained the apparent reason for the Saga’s demise.
“The very last issue that came out this year, there was… a little bit of hostility amongst some,” the school board member said. “There were editorials that were essentially, I guess what I would say, LGBTQ.”
In any cases, here’s the Throwback Thursday post with a look back at another time administrative overreach proved futile. It also contains some hints and tips for the administration at DPMHS and all the other places that are acting poorly in this regard:
3 reasons why censoring student media is the dumbest thing you can do as an administrator
The students at Har-Ber High School in Springdale, Arkansas, just got a top-notch education in the area of journalism, censorship and the power of shame this week. The school newspaper, The Herald, published an in-depth, investigative story that details the questionable transfer of several football players to another high school. The story also highlighted some questionable behavior on the part of administrators and athletic officials in regard to this situation.
Naturally, the school district was shocked by this, so district officials decided to kill the messenger:
An Arkansas school district suspended its high school newspaper and threatened to fire the teacher who advises it after student journalists wrote a story criticizing the transfer of five football players to a rival high school.
“They are like, ‘Well, you raised an uproar, we’re going to try and silence you,’” Halle Roberts, 17, the editor-in-chief of the Har-Ber Herald, told BuzzFeed News.
Censorship of any newspaper flies in the face of freedom of the press, however, administrators often feel they have the right to do so for a couple erroneous reasons:
- They are the adults. The students are kids. They believe that in the power dynamic, adult trumps kid.
- The Hazelwood decision, which administrators have come to misinterpret as carte blanche to censor.
- The principle of “ostrich syndrome,” in which people believe if they stick their head in the sand, nothing bad can happen. Thus, if we can just shut people up and nobody can see the problem, it doesn’t exist.
What followed was pure outrage from pretty much the rest of the media world. Buzzfeed News, the Associated Press and Teen Vogue covered the story as did the local publications in Arkansas. The Student Press Law Center got involved and agreed to repost the stories as a public service so anyone could read them.
Eventually, the school district caved, and the students were allowed to put the story back online. Communications director Rick Schaeffer explained the district’s rationale in a particularly bloodless way:
“After continued consideration of the legal landscape, the Springdale School District has concluded that the Har-Ber Herald articles may be reposted,” he wrote. “This matter is complex, challenging and has merited thorough review. The social and emotional well-being of all students has been and continues to be a priority of the district.
In other words, this only “merited thorough review” after you played a game of chicken with the students and not only did they fail to swerve, but they were driving a tank and you were on a bicycle.
Look, the larger problem here is not that the students had to go through all of this, but that this could have been easily avoided if the administration understood the law, realized how media works or just Googled “censoring HS paper goes to hell.” To inspire future administrators to avoid these problems (and also to help you find ways to push back against censorship), here are a few thoughts that should help keep the important stories front and center, despite the ways in which they embarrass school folks:
Stop Fighting Fire With Gasoline
The whole reason that administrators attempt to censor student media is because whatever the students published is drawing embarrassing attention to the school. Administrators surmise that if they can kill the message (or the messenger), the attention will stop coming and things will go back to normal.
Simply put, that’s as stupid as trying to put out a fire with a bucket of gasoline.
The first thing that a group of media students will do when you attack them is to make a bigger issue out of it. If they’re good enough to pull together an investigation like this one, they’re not going down without a fight and they clearly have no fear. The more you try to crack them in half, the stronger their resolve will be. That means… Wait for it… more negative attention on your school.
Now, not only does your school look like garbage for whatever the students uncovered, now EVERYBODY is looking at what they uncovered. Furthermore, additional stories are now emerging about the attempt to censor the publication and how lousy the administration is in attempting to beat up on these kids.
People who never even HEARD of your city or your school now know it for all the wrong reasons. Truth be told, even though Springdale, Arkansas is “The Poultry Capital of the World,” I never knew it existed until this censorship debacle hit my Facebook feed.
If you want to avoid problems like this, don’t let stupid things happen in your school in the first place. If you want to avoid making them worse, don’t compound the original stupidity with more of your own.
Student Media Kids Have Bodyguards
Administrators are the kings of the castle when it comes to the school itself. Who gets a hall pass, who gets early release, what the dress code needs to be and more are all at the behest of the principal or other similar administration officials. That sense of power can lead to all sorts of things, not the least of which is the assumption that might makes right.
OK, but what happens when you aren’t the strongest person there anymore? What happens when the kids realize this and figure, “Hey, we just need a bodyguard…”
The bad news for you is that they already HAVE those kinds of folks and they aren’t remotely afraid of you. You lack power over them and they have no problem saying, “OK, you wanna play? Let’s play.” These “bodyguards” are folks like the Student Press Law Center, which has a mission and purpose to stand up for students getting messed around by overreaching administrators. These “bodyguards” are journalists at the local and national media outlets, who value the kids’ efforts and disdain censorship of all kinds. (Plus, they probably remember getting messed over by an administrator during their time as students and didn’t like feeling helpless.)
If you decide to step into the ring with the students and do something dumb like this, the students will have plenty of people at the ready who will do everything in their power to make you really regret it.
This Is Not Your Father’s Censorship
A few years back, I spoke to a school board in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, where the student publication had been censored and the last line I left them with is one that should ring in your ears forever: “Control is an illusion.”
In the days of Hazelwood (1980s), when an administrator dropped the hammer on a student publication, that was pretty much the end of it. If the paper wasn’t allowed to print something, the students had virtually no other way to get that story out to the public. You were the gatekeeper and you slammed the gate.
That’s not how anything works anymore.
The minute you decide to censor the paper, pull the piece off of the paper’s website or whatever else you think will stop the story from gaining traction, the kids have 12,148 other ways to get this thing out there.
Case in point: The Herald’s story was reposted to the SPLC website so everyone on Earth could read it. People in the student media community were tweeting links to the story everywhere. Someone took a photo of the print edition and it was making the rounds on Facebook, Twitter and other social media. I’m sure you could get a T-shirt made with the whole story on it at CustomInk, if you put your mind to it…
The point is, control has always been an illusion, but now more than ever, you have no control over content. The more suppression you attempt to impose, the harder people will work to share the information you want to suppress.
In summary, you need to realize that trying to censor student media these days is like trying to grab a fist full of Jell-O: The harder you squeeze, the less successful you are. If you really want this thing to go away, do the smart thing: Applaud the work of the students, tell whoever asks that you’re looking into it and fix the problem if you can.
It’s the adult thing to do.