A reminder that the First Amendment has always been at risk. It’s what we do to push back that matters. (A throwback post)

Given the current climate related to how poorly journalists are being treated, it felt like a good time to reach back for a throwback post that feels more hopeful.

Mary Beth Tinker has been a First Amendment advocate for more than 50 years, serving as the namesake of one of the Supreme Court’s most important free expression cases. (Although she is usually quick to point out it’s her brother, John, whose name came first in court documents, thus making him the “Tinker” in the famous “Tinker v. Des Moines” case.)

Tinker spoke at the Kettle Moraine Press Association convention back in 2019 about the importance of the case, why high school students deserve the rights the First Amendment grants them and why it’s important to keep hope alive.


 

“We live in mighty times:” Mary Beth Tinker urges high school students to exercise their First Amendment rights

Tinker

Today’s world of anger, mistrust and public friction is a lot like the era in which Mary Beth Tinker went from being a scared teenage girl to being the namesake of a landmark Supreme Court decision, the First Amendment icon said Friday.

“We live in mighty times,” she said. “These times are so much like the times were when I was growing up. It does make life a little more interesting.”

Tinker spoke at UW-Whitewater as part of the Kettle Moraine Press Association’s scholastic journalism conference, in which she told students about her free-speech activities and urged them to find something that matters to them.

“The press is so important to our democracy…,” she said. “You hold government accountable. You hold those in power accountable.”

In 1963, she first wore an arm band to school to protest racists who had been bombing black churches to keep segregation in place, she said. (“They’re back again,” she added.) However, it was her decision to take part in a larger protest against the Vietnam War in 1965 at the age of 13, that brought her to the forefront of the free-speech movement. The school suspended Tinker and several others, including her brother, John, for the actions.

“A lady called on the phone and threatened to kill me,” Tinker said. “She told me, ‘Kids don’t know anything about Vietnam. Guess what I found out? Adults didn’t know anything about Vietnam. They couldn’t find it on the map.”

The Tinkers and other sued the district and lost at every level of appeal except the one that mattered most: The U.S. Supreme Court. In its 1969 decision, the court ruled 7-2 in favor of Tinker, with Justice Abe Fortas famously noting that “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

At the time, Tinker said she wasn’t thinking about being a free-speech icon.

“We lost at the district level and we lost at the appeals level,” she said. I went on with my life. I went rollerskating and I went back to my classes… I had no idea how important that case was.”

Fifty years later, Tinker continues to preach the importance of student activities that serve the best the First Amendment has to offer. She told the audience of student journalists that they should find something that matters to them and speak out about it.

“The number one reason for censorship?” she asked rhetorically. “An article reflects poorly on the school… Without controversy we have no democracy, we have no education. We can deal with controversy in ways that are respectful.”

One of the biggest things that came out of the entire legal fight, Tinker said, was that the courts opened the door to more speech from traditionally suppressed sources.

“The court ruled sometimes students have something to teach our teachers,” she said. “It said, ‘Students are persons.’”

11 Veteran-Related Story Ideas for Veterans Day (11/11)

An “Honor Through Action” photo I took a few years back, with the V including the initials of people who mattered to you who served, along with their branch designations. Thanks to all of you who serve or have served. I am respectful and grateful for all you do and have done.

In honor of Veterans Day, we put together a collection of story starters and topics that could lead to some engaging journalism for folks looking to do more than event stories. Some of these may be too late for this year’s holiday, but they also could inspire other ideas along the same lines. Here we go…

What do veterans do on Veterans Day and other similar holidays? I remember working on a story about Memorial Day and a veteran was telling us how it was a time of significant reflection for him. In that same story, another veteran said it bothered him that the solemnity of the holiday had become “a day for a mattress sale.”

Along those same lines, it would be interesting to find out what veterans in your community do on Veterans Day. The school my mom used to work at had a large assembly, where veterans would explain their experiences to the students, helping them to see what life in the military meant to them. Other similar events give veterans a chance for recognition and appreciation.

On the other hand, some folks may not take part in these events for myriad reasons or even really spend much time thinking about their own service. A wide array of perspectives on this could lead to an interesting story.

The G.I. Bill: This started near the end of World War II as the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 and was intended to help military personnel returning to civilian life. The underlying principles and ideals remain intact today through several pieces of federal legislation.

What benefits exist today for those veterans covered under specific bills passed over the years? How are today’s more recent veterans benefiting and how are the benefits assisting older veterans? A look at the local impact of this package could be helpful to fill in non-military members on how this all works.

What kinds of veterans programs are available on your campus for returning students? Bringing this idea closer to home, learning what veterans who enter school as part of their benefit packages can expect upon entering campus life could be informative and beneficial to these incoming students.

Some schools have significant veteran presences on their campus and meet those needs with well-developed programs. Others might have fewer opportunities or veteran-specific organizations available. Find out what’s out there.

What’s the current state of VFW Posts and other similar venues? As a kid, I remember seeing VFW buildings in most places we lived or had family. The one I got a chance to enter back then had this amazing kind of time-capsule charm, with an old Formica bar, old music trickling out of some low-hanging speakers and some tables where guys with wrinkled tattoos on their arms sipped beer and told tales.

The Veterans of Foreign Wars organization states on its website that it has more than 6,000 posts throughout the country. I’m quite certain that my one experience isn’t all that’s there, nor do I imagine that they have remained trapped in time, given a lot of the folks joining are in many ways different than the “old guys” I remember seeing. What the organization does and what purpose these posts

Build me some explainers: Between the various branches, the specific rules and the general insular nature of the military, it’s not always easy for civilians to grasp this organization.

Anything can be a good opportunity for text or graphic explainer stories: how ranks work, what each branch does, what certain words mean, what certain rules require etc. These short, smart pieces can provide a bridge between military and civilian life and understanding.

Who are the veterans of today (and tomorrow)? When I was a kid, the veterans were either the stereotypical grandpas who fought in World War II or Korea, along with some dads who were Vietnam era vets. A lot has changed in the military since those folks were standard G.I., so finding out what the data on more recent vets would be helpful and informative.

It’s also interesting to see of the people who are enlisting now, what a “veteran” might look like in the following 10 or 15 years has some potential for a story.

The second half of a lifer’s life: Some military folks decide to make the military their careers, as they stay with a branch of service until retirement. According to military service information, a person can retire with full pension after 20 years of active service.  In some cases, this means someone could retire as early as their late 30s or early 40s.

The question then becomes, “What’s next?” In some cases, this means using the skills they’ve acquired to take on new challenges, while in others, it’s a start of a whole new career and life. For others, it’s taking time to do all the things they put aside until their military service was over. Finding out what people do with this portion of life, particularly as people continue to live longer, healthier lives, would be an interesting investigation.

“A very particular set of skills”: Speaking of skills, it’s always interesting to find out what skills the military values in people coming in and what types of skills today’s military members are receiving.

I remember once my dad telling me that he had to take a typing test as part of his service, but I can’t remember why. The one story I do remember from my grandfather was that he took stenography in high school (“That’s where the girls were,” he said.) and that became helpful during his hitch in the Navy. An officer needed two people to go through intercepted radio message, one to translate the content into English and the other to write it down quickly.

What is it that people today are learning, or what is it that recruiters are told to find in folks looking to enlist because those underlying skills have value to today’s military?

The Honor Flight experience: I’ve known a couple people who have been able to take these flights. Just read this site and try to find someone who did it. Even if you don’t write a story, it’s worth it.

The collectors market: People of all stripes collect all manner of things. (A friend recently told me their husband had a huge collection of everything having to do with Dolly Parton, including tour-worn shoes and a “Dolly” pinball machine…)

When it comes to military collectables, it might be interesting to see what life is like in that world. What things tend to be valued and what things tend to be problematic. (A friend who collected World War II stuff used to say, “Nothing with a swastika will ever be in my hands.”) Also, it would be interesting to see what people who have served tend to think about this hobby and the people who frequent it.

Who is preserving the history of the veterans? Back when I was in Missouri, we decided to run a story that tried to get a veteran from each of the wars of that century to discuss a topic. I kind of groused that we couldn’t find a World War I vet, to which my boss replied, “You don’t have many left to find.” At that point, most were gone and even those who had served at the tail end of the conflict would be nearing 100.

Today, the same thing is happening to World War II vets, as the war itself is now an octogenarian. Even the youngest people to enlist in the latter stages of the conflict are reaching the century mark. Next will be those who served in Korea and so forth. Even people who served during peace time between those conflicts are becoming few and far between,

When we lose people who actually saw and did things, we lose the history they can provide. That was why so many organizations sought to capture information from people who lived through certain time periods or experiences.  Who is out there doing this for certain branches of the military, certain states/cities/communities in which service was part of life? What do they have preserved and what do they need to continue their work? This could lead to a short call-to-action story or a longer look at a deeper topic.

A Dead Body, A Lost Cabbie and The Best Friends in the World: Recapping the National College Media Convention

The Dan Reimold Student Media Champion award means a lot to me for a lot of reasons, but maybe the biggest reason is that I was supported and nominated by two of the best friends a guy could have, Steven Chappell and Julie Lewis. Thanks, Mizzou, for putting these people in my life.

(EDITOR’S NOTE: I try to keep the blog focused on stuff to do with the books, journalism, student media and more, following that 70-20-10 rule of blogging, with only 10 percent being some form of personal or promotional thing. For some reason, it feels like the last couple weeks were full of  those 10 percent days, so feel free to skip it if you feel I’ve already used up your willingness to tolerate me in promotion mode. -VFF)

The Fall National College Media Convention was everything I could have imagined and then some. Where else could a group of student journalists end up following the wrong set of directions to a prestigious newspaper, only to have the trolley they were on break down, just in time for them to see police cordoning off an area around a dead body?

They also apparently scooped the newspaper on this topic. When Steve Chappell reached out to a friend at the KC Star about this, the response was, “Well, THAT didn’t come over the scanner…”

If you ever attended a student media convention, you know Steve well, as this hall-of-fame member of CMA has been everything from an award-winning adviser to the technology coordinator for myriad conventions to a board member to a convention organizer. He’s also been one of the best friends anyone can have, and I say that having known him more than half my life.

Steve nominated me for this year’s Dan Reimold Student Media Champion award, which “is given to individuals, organizations or institutions who go above and beyond to champion the cause, importance and joy of college media in general… Reimold was a champion of the idea that college media is a space for anyone to learn and develop life skills – not solely those expecting to practice journalism after graduation.”

Dan and I were both in that “up-and-coming” group of advisers back in the early 2010 era, and it absolutely stunned me (and many others) when he died in 2015 at age 34 after suffering a seizure. To have my name attached to anything related to Dan is one of those honors I’ll treasure forever, given how much he gave to student media and how he did everything possible to make student media a wonderful place for everyone.

(I don’t know how other people view awards like this, but for me, I think of them as less about what I’ve done and more like the establishment of a standard I need to live up to. It’s like, “OK, we said you’re good at this. Now, go prove you really are.”)

The convention itself was a blur of wonderfulness, as I flew in Wednesday and flew back out Friday night. The only real problems were with travel, as is the wont for life these days. On the way back, I got stuck in O’Hare when my flight got cancelled, only to rent a car and drive the rest of the way home in the middle of the night.

That paled in comparison to my travel to the event, when, $55 into a cab ride, the cabbie turned around and asked, “Do you know where we are?”

Regardless, the goal was to be as helpful as possible to as many people as possible in as many ways as possible. When I wasn’t giving a session on crime reporting, blogging or newsroom burnout, I was hunkered down at a table in the main convention area, cramming as many publication critiques onto my schedule as possible. I got to see newspapers and magazines from all over the country and spend time with some of the most dedicated people I’ve ever met.

Advisers give so much of themselves to help students find their way in life, all while dealing with inane academic bureaucracies, funding problems and the general chaos of overseeing a media outlet. The students sacrifice so much of their college lives as they become part of these incredibly strange, yet perfectly wonderful, surrogate families that are forged in the fire of deadline, god-awful energy drinks and AP style books.

Being around these folks fills me with this childish glee that reminds me of how incredible student media is and why I have loved it since my first step into a newsroom. Going to a convention with them is like hooking into an energy source that makes me feel like I could run forever.

May The Odds Be Ever In Your Favor: Fall National College Media Convention Edition

Since my school is still trying to figure out how to do business cards for us and I tend to meet a lot of people who ask, “Do you have a card?” I tried to capture the weirdness of my being with this thing that I’ll be passing out at the National College Media Convention this week.

This week will be sparse on the blog, as I’m traveling to Kansas City to take part in the 2026 Fall National College Media Convention. I’ve always loved this event and I’m thrilled to be doing a few sessions and some newspaper critiques for the students there.

Thanks to the folks who run this amazing thing, I’ve gotten to meet thousands of students, work with hundreds of amazing advisers and come face to face with legends of the media world.

(I also once had to track down a student who hooked up with a firefighter in another state and couldn’t be found until literally three hours before our flight home, so not every experience was sunshine and rainbows…)

In honor of the “prediction markets” and other forms of selective wagering that seems to be in fashion today, please allow me to add some odds for some convention-oriented experiences:

5-1: Odds my first flight is late while my connecting flight is early.

8-1: Odds the first question in any of my sessions will start with “This isn’t a question, but more of a comment…”

3-1: Odds of people saying, “The conference app doesn’t work!”

382,481-1: Odds the app really doesn’t work.

3-1: Odds some insane breaking news thing happens back home while everyone, except Jimmy the Freshman and “that rando who only does indie movie reviews,” is at the convention.

1-8: Odds of students trying to get advisers to drink with them.

6-1: Odds advisers will acquiesce only to regret it later.

15-1: Ratio of students attending sessions after 9 a.m. compared to those attending sessions at 9 a.m.

80-1: Odds your “bulletproof” fake ID will work in the hotel bar.

5-1: At least half the people attending any of my sessions will be confused by my random “Filak-isms.”

2-1: Odds of staffers coming home with “amazingly cool new ideas” that their advisers have been suggesting for the past five years.

Even Money: Odds of the convention consuming more booze than Wisconsinites during the Brewers World Series run.

20-1: Odds all the homework students brought to “do it on the plane” or “do after the sessions are done” actually gets done.

 

Let’s set some Over/Under bets as well:

7: Average number of students sleeping in a standard double-occupancy room.

8: Fire alarms going off at the hotel.

1: Actual fire that happened.

142: Staff manuals adding “No incense-burning on overnight trips” to the list of convention do’s and don’t’s.

27: Number of jaunty hats seen.

19: Metric tons of BBQ consumed by attendees.

1,349: Number of staff T-shirts featuring double entendres like, “We put out twice a week” or “We do it digitally.”

114: Number of relationships launched.

211: Number of breakups occurring.

11: Number of ill-advised adviser karaoke sessions, all of which will be set to “Don’t Stop Believing” by Journey.

83,282,012: Number of “The wi-fi here sucks” complaints.

83,282,013: Number of “We never even used to get wi-fi in the hotel” responses issued by people my age and older.

53: Number of times I will have to apologize for telling stories that include dead bodies and drug dealers.

812: Number of students attempting to hook up with a staffer from another college media outlet.

811: Number of students lying about “totally scoring” last night.

6: Number of students in each of my 20-student classes who will email me to ask if we have class on Wednesday, despite me telling them 12 times, listing it in the syllabus, sending 15 reminders through Canvas and me writing it on the whiteboard in front of my office.

Looking forward to seeing you all there and may the odds be ever in your favor…

Vince (a.k.a. The Doctor of Paper)

Around the Bases of Life with My Dad and the Milwaukee Brewers

I’m sitting alone on my couch as I write this, witnessing something I’d never thought I’d see in my lifetime: A World Series Championship for the Milwaukee Brewers.

Somewhere in the late innings of the 4-1 clincher, I texted my mom:

“How is Dad doing?

Her response: “Tense…”

If you have been a Milwaukee Brewers fan as long as he has been, that totally makes sense. You never want to even HOPE that it MIGHT be our turn because that hope is so fragile that it seems like the universe is just taunting us, daring us to hope, just to crush that hope.

Hope has not been the friend of Brewers fans since 1982, the last time the team went to the World Series. We’ve consistently endured last-place finishes, horrible managerial choices, bad drafts and mediocre teams. The other constant over the past 44 years has been the trove of memories the Brewers have provided to Dad and me.

 

An early photo of Dad and me outside our old house on Armor Avenue. Just a brief reminder that the 1970s were not good to anyone who wore clothes.

I was 8 years old in 1982 when Dad took me to my first baseball game. Had he known it was Bat Day in the middle of a pennant race, he might have thought twice about going that day.

We climbed into the upper deck of old County Stadium and the first thing I noticed was the giant barrel and mug in the outfield. Dad explained that when a Brewer hit a homer, a guy would slide down from the barrel into the mug and release balloons, but I shouldn’t get my hopes up, as homers were rare.

The Brewers hit four that day.

Hitting homers had become the trademark of that team. It was known as Harvey’s Wallbangers, a play on the name of manager Harvey Kuenn and the popular 1970s drink. All summer and into fall, we followed the Brewers’ charge to the top of the standings, listening to announcer Bob Uecker on the radio or catching the local broadcast on Channel 18.

A Harvey Wallbanger: 1.5 oz vodka, 4 oz OJ, 1/2 oz Galliano. Mix the OJ and vodka, then float the Galliano on top. You’re welcome.

We made it all the way to the World Series that year, only to lose in seven games. Mom sent me to bed early in Game 7, but I snuck out of my upstairs bedroom and crouched silently at the top of the steps, straining to hear the TV in the living room. When the game finally ended with a Gorman Thomas strike out, I slunk back to bed and I cried.

Still, there was always next year. There had to be. We had five future hall of famers on that team. Heck, if Rollie Fingers doesn’t get hurt toward the end of the season, we probably would have won it all. Harvey Kuenn was coming back as manager. We had more experience.

Next year, we all thought. Wait until next year.

That year, 1983, the Brewers finished a respectable 87-75, but management fired Kuenn. A year later, the team finished 36.5 games out of first. With a few notable teases, it didn’t much better than that for quite some time.

As far as Dad and I were concerned, it wasn’t bad at all. He managed to get in with some guys who shared a season ticket package consisting of four front-row seats along the third-base line. We got something like a dozen games a year and each one was a thrill.

No matter what game we got that first season, it seemed like Bill Wegman was always pitching, which made sense as he started 32 games that year, finishing with a 5-12 record.

I also caught my first ball that year, tossed to me by Cleveland pitcher Jamie Easterly.

“Caught” might be a bit of an overstatement, as he tossed it to me and I dropped it. The ball rolled down the tarp in front of our seats and out onto the warning track. Easterly took pity on me, jogging back to pick it up and put it in my hand.

“Don’t drop it this time, kid,” he said as he trotted out to the bullpen.

That day, a Cleveland baseball fan was born. Another tragic tale of wasted youth…

It wasn’t the only ball we’d get in those seats, with one of the more memorable ones coming off the bat of slugger Rob Deer.

In the ninth inning of a losing effort, Deer fouled a ball down the third-base line. It went right into our seats, through my dad’s hands and into the skull of my friend Sean’s dad. County Stadium personnel rushed us to the infirmary, where they made sure he was OK. When they finally released us, the game was over, the stadium was empty and we were locked inside.

As we tried to figure out how to get back to the car, we spotted pitcher Teddy Higuera, giving autographs to a couple kids. Sean and I went over and he signed our scorecards. As that was happening, more players kept coming our way, so we kept getting autographs. At that point, we figured we’d wait for Deer and see if he could sign the ball he’d hit.

Eventually, a security guard unlocked a gate and chased us out, but we caught up with Deer in the parking lot, who obliged us. Sean’s dad put a bandaid on the signed ball as a joke and displayed it proudly on his mantle.

Of all the autographs on this, I treasure Gorman Thomas the most. After he signed for me, Dad asked, “Who was that homeless looking janitor you were talking to?”

Over the years, players often stopped by our seats during batting practice for an autograph or to toss us a ball. Boston Red Sox first baseman Bill Buckner even put his glove down in front of me as stopped to tie his shoe.

“Hey, Bill,” Dad called out to him. “How about an autograph for the kid?”

Buckner didn’t even look up. “I don’t do that stuff.” He then walked away.

(Later that year, this happened to Buckner. I will not claim causation, merely correlation.)

Eventually, we stopped being part of that ticket package, as I got older and we had more commitments. Still, Dad would get us tickets to a game or two, here or there. When we weren’t at the stadium, he’d have the ballgame on the radio while he was working in the garage or doing some yard work.

When I moved back home after 10 years out of state, we found ourselves going to games again. One of my favorite moments was when the whole family went to a game together. Dad and Zoe sat next to each other as he explained how certain parts of the game worked as she munched on a soft pretzel.

That year, the Brewers made a run toward the playoffs, clinching the wildcard berth on the last day of the season. The minute the Marlins beat the Mets to seal the deal, my phone rang. It was Dad.

“Get some tickets. We’re going to a playoff game.”

The Brewers lost that series 3-1 to the Phillies, but we saw the one game they won.

That started the halcyon days of fandom for us, as each year we seemed to make one more step toward the Promised Land. The Wild Card, the NLDS, the NLCS… Dad and I caught a game each of those steps, managing to see them win a game in each series.

The thing I remember most about those games wasn’t the hitting or pitching or score, but how wonderful it was to be there with Dad and how much he loved those experiences. In a textbook definition of irony, he was genuinely happy to be in a crowded place, filled with lines, that charged more for a single beer than he’d pay for a 12 pack. Being in those moments with him reminded me why I wanted to move home in the first place.

Over the past few years, we kept saying the same thing to each other, “Can you imagine what a World Series game would be like? If the Brewers make it, we’re going.”

For the past eight years, they came so tantalizingly close… Each year, we waited… waited until next year…

When “next year” finally became this year, I found myself desperately pounding the keyboard in my office, trying to get tickets to one of the games in Milwaukee. Amid the chaos, I managed to land a pair that cost more than my first car, which naturally freaked me out, so I called Mom. Turns out, she was in church that weekday morning, praying that we’d get tickets.

“It’s fine,” she said. “We’ve got it covered. Whatever it takes. You guys need to go.”

So, last week, I drove down to Milwaukee on Friday to catch Game 1. We paid $20 to park in a driveway about a mile from the stadium, the money apparently going to the Lego fund of the kids whose parents lived there.

After we sat down in  our seats, oddly enough located along the third-base line near the tarp, Dad turned to me and said, “This is worth every nickel.” It was still three hours before the first pitch.

As the teams took the field, Dad turned to me and said, “This is amazing. I’m just shaking.”

To explain the next three hours takes more than I can put into words. The whole night was a blur. I think I bought a couple giant beers and and high-fived at least a dozen strangers. Dad never stopped smiling.

After the game was over and we were back at home somewhere around midnight, neither of us could even think about sleeping. We just kept talking about the game over and over and over.

“This was one of the greatest moments of my life,” Dad said.

“Me too,” I replied. “Thanks, Dad. Thanks for everything.”

 

 

 

Three Reasons Media Writing Students Have Trouble With Brevity

 

I came across this social media post that does a fantastic job of explaining why teaching media writing continues to be difficult. The sarcastic point is that quality is less of a concern when applying a rigid rubric that places a primary value on size.

 

My media-writing students often complain that writing a 25-35 word lead is impossible or that using one-sentence paragraphs of paraphrase can’t be done.

Their frustration is often magnified when they are taking this course alongside those in English, sociology, poli sci, history and others where grades are dependent upon “making the page count.” When they need to distill their thoughts into a single sentence or a few short, tight paragraphs, it can feel like driving 95 miles per hour and then suddenly hitting rush hour traffic in Chicago.

What occurred to me in watching my students interact with friends and classmates is that students have no difficulty in writing short content. As their thumbs fly across the touchscreens of their phones, they can make quick points to the person on the other end, such as “This class sucks” or “Why does he only teach 8 a.m.s?” or “U up?” This isn’t a situation in which they can’t contain their verbosity while writing about a fire or a speech, as to do so would undermine their literary gusto.

Instead, I’d argue that several key things are problematic in keeping them writing tightly:

SIZE HAS ALWAYS MATTERED: The most obvious reason students write longer than they should is that assignments have always incentivized them to do so. The paper needs to be five pages, so if they only write four, it’s a penalty. If they write six, hey, they must be doing something good, right?

Whether it’s forcing students to write a 500-word essay or a 10-page paper, instructors have set parameters that are less about quality and more about quantity. It’s why students are always looking for the font that expands their papers or have figured out the ridiculous “period trick.”

Instructors have often told me that they need to include page minimums (and occasionally maximums) to force students to complete a specific amount of work. I understand this, as my foundational media-writing class provides size guidelines for some of the larger pieces we write. They’ve also argued that a well-written, logically developed paper will usually land at that page count, so they’re just setting a target for the students.

Media writing used place primacy on size as well either in terms of time (make the package 1:45) or space (this needs to be 10 inches), but it usually was because space and time were precious commodities. We were trying to squeeze things down to the most basic aspects of what mattered because we didn’t have the time or space to do more.

(There have been notable exceptions, as often marked by “end-of-newscast banter” or the time I had to fill a hole on the front page that was three times the size of what I could reasonably gather from a breaking news scene.)

With everything shifting to digital, we now have all the space in the world and a lot of people are using it for some pretty long-winded writing. (Yes, I can smell the irony I’m cooking here..)

This leads to the second problem we’re facing…

 

STUDENTS CAN’T EVALUATE VALUE APPROPRIATELY: Students in the Missourian newsroom used to complain that I had the most frustrating answer to “How long should this story be?”

“Write it for what it’s worth.”

In other words, figure out how much value is actually there, how much information you have and what people need to know without padding the crap out of it. Then, shoot for that mark.

Evaluating value is harder than evaluating size. I can easily tell you if my 500-word essay is 500 words, but it takes a lot more critical thought to determine if it’s any good. It’s also harder for students to get a handle on value because they have more difficulty distilling information to a single, valuable point.

The hardest exercises for my reporting students were the ones where we had them attend a meeting and then write a story. Almost every story had a “held a meeting” lead and then took the fire hose approach to providing information about everything that happened at the event. Once they learned how to focus on specific elements of interest, they got better at thematic leads. That led to a tighter focus and eliminated random writing.

When the students don’t know what matters (and a grade is on the line), they tend to revert to the essay approach of just pouring everything in there, and making it as long as possible, with the hope that the professors would say, “Screw it. The answer is in there somewhere. It’s a B+.”

AUDIENCE-CENTRICITY REMAINS A FOREIGN CONCEPT: One of the more interesting studies I did in terms of how media writers think involved student journalists who were responsible for handling social media for their publications. I had them respond to a series of Uses and Gratifications items, which measured which things they found most important when using social media (being aware of important things around them, educating themselves on important topics, passing the time away while bored etc.).

After they rated those items as “consumers,” I had them look at what they did in disseminating social media to their audience, which was presumably somewhat similar to them. They then rated those items again in terms of how they approached their job as the “sender” of social media.

In reviewing the scales, there was almost ZERO overlap, meaning that they knew what they liked to read and watch on social media, but never once thought about shaping their own work to mirror those values while sending social media to their peers.

It’s like the conversation I had with a student who wrote a 2,500-word story on a football game:

Him: “I wouldn’t read that.”

Me: “OK, so why did you write it?”

Him: “I really liked to write it and I didn’t want to leave anything out.”

This is not just a student problem, as I’ve seen a number of people who are way too happy about their own prose to consider brevity a virtue. It took a lot of time for me to start thinking about the readers, and there are still days I don’t get it right.

The point is, if you know your audience, you’ll know if they’ll read 10,000 words on why ketchup is ketchup or if they’ll get bored after 200 words on a school board meeting. You’ll also know what content should be the focal point, what tone will resonate best and what amount of content they are willing to consume.

Four fun election-year stories that go beyond horse-race coverage (A Throwback Post)

With the elections coming down to the final (merciful) days, trying to find something decent to do in terms of an election story can seem a bit bleak. That’s especially true when you start seeing things like this popping up:

I mean, damn…  See, mom? Another reason for me not to go into politics… 

With that in mind, today’s throwback post looks at a few stories that could be a bit more of a lite-brite and a little less of a tour through the sewer. Enjoy.


Four fun election-year stories that go beyond horse-race coverage

Journalists are often accused of doing “horse-race coverage” when it comes to elections, telling stories about polling data, attitudes toward key election issues and how to properly eat a corn dog at the county fair. The primary season is in full swing and with the November election is being talked about like this scene in “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade:”

With all of that in mind, consider a few stories that could be relevant, useful and dare I say fun for college journalists who want to break the election mold:

RENTERS OR OWNERS? WHO CHOOSES THE SIGNS? In driving to work each day, I pass a ton of student rental housing, including single-family homes and multi-unit apartment complexes. The lawns of a good many of them display signs that pitch candidates for local, state and national elections. The question that popped up in my head was this: “Who is supporting these people? The folks renting the place or the owner of the property?”

There is likely a set of rules in your city or state regarding the display and removal of political signage, so this might be a good time to look into this. It might also be interesting to pull the rental agreements to find out if there are any rules woven in the fine print that can explain who has the right to do what in terms of display and promotion like this. In today’s fractured political environment, I imagine that at least a few students would have some issues if a sign for CANDIDATE X was on their lawn and those students hated CANDIDATE X.

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OF DETAILS: Politics covers a great many things including party affiliation, issue stances and campaign promises, but often the smallest of weird details can win or lose someone an election. The story that Jimmy “The Greek” Snyder tells about making his first big betting win in politics touches on this: In a documentary, he notes that he put his money on Harry Truman after his sister told him that she wasn’t going to vote for Thomas Dewey because women don’t trust men who have mustaches.

Similar weird things have made a difference for politicians along the way. A former pol told me that he had been advised to use a shortened version of his name instead of the full name, because it sounded more relatable. In other words, if I were to run, I should be on the ballot as “Vince Filak” not “Vincent Filak” and certainly not “Vincent F. Filak, Ph.D.” Everything from the color and font people pick for their signage to the types of things they do or wear on the campaign trail can be part of this. Color gurus note that blue-collar voters prefer base colors like pure reds and blues, while more educated or sophisticated voters tend to go for obscure colors or muted hues.

A cool story might be to talk to poli sci and psych profs about this kind of thing if you can find an expert in the area. See if there is a way to separate fact from fiction and data from superstition.

 

THE STATE OF ELECTION SWAG: Over the years that I’ve visited estate sales, I’ve seen a wide array of election-related items for a wide array of office seekers. There were the Milwaukee Braves game schedules that included pitches for judicial candidates, bottle openers for city council reps and pin backs for all sorts of folks. Bumper stickers seem to always been in fashion, as are hats and signs and flags. There were also some weird spoons I saw once for someone running for something that was likely from about the late 1800s or early 1900s.

With everything seemingly going digital these days, are there more or fewer of these items being put forth by candidates? I think I got a Wisconsin sports schedule at a Fourth of July parade in Omro one year, and I know I can get a bumper sticker from either the Dem or GOP headquarters in Oshkosh. Beyond that, are there other creative items that are making the rounds or is swag on the down slope? What are some of the best/worst ideas out there, according to collectors. See what’s available to you on the average Saturday at the farmers market or a parade/rally.

 

ELECTION DAY FOR THE “DONE” POLITICIAN: When athletes retire, they often end up on those game day shows, where they talk about strategies and tactics and all that. They also often talk both publicly and privately about either missing the game or not missing the game at all. Getting this kind of insight is helpful and amazing to sports fans, who never once experienced what it’s like to be in a locker room or on a field like that.

Find a former politician who isn’t running for something and see if you can hang out during Election Day to do a piece that echoes the sports thing. It could be someone who lost an election and is dying to get back in or a person who retired and feels burned out by the whole situation. What’s life like for the “player” when they are no longer “in the game.”

Political Ads Are Annoying As Hell, But They Also Set The Agenda For Our Votes

(How long until we are done with this election?)

I spent the weekend at my folks’ house and the only good thing I have to say about the political ads running on TV there is that they were new to me. Granted, we all get the same Wisconsin gubernatorial race ads that try to paint Democrat David Crowley as a tax-and-spend, illegal-immigrant-loving, healthcare failure or paint Republican Tom Tiffany as a Trump-loving, self-serving, BS-wielding MAGA robot.

(To bring balance to the force, here’s an ad hating on Tom Tiffany. Whoever is scrubbing YouTube these days made it hard to find an embed video..)

However, since my parents are in a different House district, I was spared the attack ads I normally see back home and instead got some new attack ads that explained why each candidate was horrible.

Almost every study or poll you see says that a supermajority of people in the United States hate, hate, HATE negative political ads. However, they also dominate the airwaves, even as viewers say they have already made up their minds and don’t believe most of what they see in political ads.

Research indicates that this is because the ads work, but maybe not in the way you would normally think.

Campaigns are often defined by a few basic issues and those issues vary based on a number of factors. In some cases, those factors are personally attached to the candidate (adultery, criminal record) while in others, it’s about the broader society (economy, “family values,” drug legalization, crime). These ads help make those issues salient, or in other words, they harp on a topic enough to make you think about it first and foremost when it comes to a candidate or a race.

The underlying theory that can help us understand this is called agenda setting, which explains how and why these kinds of ads “work.” The theory was developed by Max McCombs and Donald Shaw in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when they studied how media reports influenced potential voters in elections. Very simply, their research found that media content was not very successful at telling people what to think, but the media was exceptionally valuable in telling people what to think ABOUT.

For example, we have a lot of ads out here that try to paint Republican candidates as Trump-following boot-lickers who prioritize the rich above everyone else. You might or might not believe that to be the case about any particular candidate, but agenda setting says that, thanks to all these ads, you are thinking about that as a key issue in the race.

In looking at the ads out here versus those at my folks’ house, I got to see how they differed in terms of the “issues” people were using ads to try to agenda set for voters. Out here, it’s a lot of “economy” ads, with a push on how the person is or isn’t “for you as a regular, normal voter.” I still got some of that at my folks’ house:

 

 

However, I got a lot of “this candidate is too radical and scary to elect” ads as well:

 

(Mitchell Berman is your worst nightmare… Or something like that…)

If you look back to the 2024 presidential election cycle, transgender issues were being agenda-set with ads that noted “CANDIDATE X is for they/them, not for you!” In short, the attack ads were trying to make the case that a candidate’s support for transgender individuals made them unfit to serve. To whatever degree you believe that to be true or not is up to you, according to agenda setting theory, but instead of thinking about 8,012 other issues, you’re thinking about a candidate’s record on transgender rights.

 

EXERCISE TIME: Go through the more localized video/audio political ads of your area (U.S. House, State House, State Senate) and see what issues keep coming up from supporters of each political party. See how many of these things are part of what you feel the election will swing on. Also, talk with the class about the degree to which these issues have set the agenda for the political discussions in your area.

Be nice and don’t punch anyone.

A Year After He Was Fired For Not Censoring The Indiana Daily Student, Jim Rodenbush Reflects On Life, Student Media And His New Gig

Jim Rodenbush was a student media adviser, First-Amendment advocate and champion for experiential learning in journalism at Indiana University until he was fired one year ago. In discussing the stupidity of his firing, he was open about the way in which university officials were disingenuous in their dealings with him and how his unwillingness to forsake the student journalists led to his dismissal.

He also talked a lot about how what was the start of the worst year of his life ended up reminding him of why he fought in the first place. All the people he knew over the years, and many he’d never known, popped out of the woodwork to offer help and support, something that really meant something to him.

Jim is no longer a student media adviser, but he is still actively involved in shaping student journalists in his new gig at Western Kentucky. He remains a First-Amendment advocate and champion for all the good things that great educators do for their students.

To encapsulate this crazy year is beyond my ability, but fortunately, Jim took to LinkedIn to give his friends and colleagues a recap. It’s published below with permission from Jim:


 

One year ago today, I was fired from Indiana University.

A lot can happen in one year. You would think being fired would be a defining event. Turns out, it wasn’t even close.

One week later, my dad died. Three months after that, my sister died. I moved twice. I started over in a new place, with a new job and a new community.

Along the way, I experienced pretty much every emotion you could imagine. When you feel like you’ve been kicked to the curb by your employer, it’s not a happy time. You go through it all — sadness, anger, defiance. Then, a period of really weird quiet. There were days when I considered if my career was over. Days when I wondered whether I had somehow ruined my life. Days when I wasn’t sure what would come next. When you’re unemployed for months, you have time to sit with all of those questions.

When looking back over the past year, it’s easy to first think about the person who went through everything with me.

My wife Jackie received a crash course in the First Amendment that she never asked for. She lived through every one of my emotions, every uncertainty, every move, every conversation about whether I had somehow blown up our lives. She watched me struggle with not knowing what came next while dealing with her own upheaval.

Through it all, she was strong, patient and graceful. She was willing to go through this with me, even though none of it was something she had chosen. I don’t know how you adequately thank someone for that. I’ll spend the rest of our lives figuring it out.

So many other people showed up too. Students, former colleagues, friends, journalism organizations, people I hadn’t heard from in years and people I barely knew. Then there was Bowling Green. I found a welcoming home at Western Kentucky University. The Hilltoppers have made starting over feel less like starting over. I’m grateful for that in ways I can’t fully explain just yet.

In the end, it’s weird. One of the greatest gifts of the past year may have been getting fired. Not because getting fired was good. It wasn’t. It was bad in all the possible ways. But because that moment will forever show people who I am.

When I had a choice between protecting my job and protecting what I believed student journalists deserved, I made my choice. A year later, I know that choice cost me something. I also know what it gave me, and that’s a much better understanding of who I am when things get hard.

So today isn’t really an anniversary of getting fired. It’s an anniversary of looking back at a year I never would have chosen and realizing that, somehow, there is a lot of good in life on the other side of it.

Oh, and, if there is ever such a thing as a cool souvenir from an awful moment in your life, this screen grab of an email from Mark Cuban to an IDS reporter is it. For Mark, I can be Jim Rosebush.

AI on Tilt: Why relying on Artificial Intelligence for writing often comes up short

In trying to capture what’s wrong with using AI to write, I realized that AI will complete a task based on the average collection of information available, without considering the specific pieces of information a user needs.

As with most things, I figured it out dealing with something related to pinball.

Here is an advertisement for a used pinball machine that popped up in my Facebook Marketplace feed:

This was clearly written by AI, as it covers the basic element of the overall game and describes what is in a picture of the machine. It provides basic details about a pinball machine (playfield covered by glass, has bumpers/flippers/targets, stands on four metal legs, has a power cord) with a few basic descriptors of the specific machine (Williams manufacturer, white wooden cabinet, tic-tac-toe theme).

This is the core of what AI does for writing: It gathers all the info it can on the broad concept you care about and provides it to you in a simple, clear, surface-level fashion.

In the case of something like this, however, most buyers wouldn’t care about what the average Williams OXO pinball machine looks like or is composed of. They care about specific things related to this particular machine, many of which aren’t covered here:

DOES IT WORK? I think I actually bought two working pinball machines in my life (maybe three), with all the rest of them existing in some state of disrepair. The goal for me was obvious: buy cheap, fix the broken stuff and enjoy, with the possibility to sell it later at a profit. There are various states of functionality a pinball machine of that era can have:

    • Dead: You plug it in, turn it on, nothing happens.
    • Powers up: You plug it in, turn it on, the lights go on, but nothing else.
    • Start-up sequence problems: It’ll power up and try to reset for a new game, but something goes wrong (reels won’t reset, reels won’t stop resetting, targets won’t reset, targets won’t stop resetting etc.)
    • Playable: It works with some minor hiccups (bonus won’t score properly, some switches won’t score, game ends a ball too soon etc.)
    • Fully shopped: Someone has gone through every switch, wire, coil and connection. It’s been fully cleaned, adjusted and is in as good of condition as humanly possible for a machine of its age.

I’m guessing at the $350 price tag, it’s not fully shopped, but how messed up is it will be a concern for a buyer, particularly one who isn’t fully versed in pinball repair.

BACK GLASS CONDITION: In terms of the cost of a machine, the priciest thing on one of these isn’t even related to the game play. It’s the visual art that surrounds the scoring reels and lights up at various times of the game, called the back glass.

During the time in which these machines were made, old incandescent bulbs were used to light them and those suckers got hot. Also, to make the artwork translucent for the lights, the manufacturers didn’t use paint, but rather a series of silk-screened ink layers. Pairing these two things, along with the aging process, means the artwork tends to “flake” off as the ink detaches from the glass.

It’s ridiculously expensive to replace the back glass, something I’ve discovered in trying to repair the machines. If it’s broken, missing or “totally roached,” a new or restored glass can cost more than half of what you could resell a fully restored machine of this vintage. In this case, we’re pretty closed to “roached:”

This not only impacts the visual aesthetic of the game, but also your playing experience. The light bulbs in the back glass are powerful enough to shine through the ink, so when there’s no ink, it’s just a bright light in your face. Lots of fun when you’re trying to keep the silver ball in play.

STORAGE CONDITION: Here’s where photos really don’t do you justice in buying one of these things. The way in which this was stored could lead to all sorts of damage that you can never really get rid of, especially smells. This is particularly true if you stored it somewhere damp, as mildew tends to make itself present in the uncoated wood pieces inside.

Even worse, the wiring is wrapped with vintage cloth insulation, something that mice love to eat and nest in. Your game-room treasure might actually be a giant petting zoo for mice. Also, if you haven’t had to clean the smell of mouse urine out of vintage wood, I can’t begin to describe what you’d be in for, but let’s just say it’s not good.

IS IT ALL THERE?: This question gets at a few things that matter to buyers. First, if it isn’t working at all, you want to make sure someone didn’t start cannibalizing it for parts, which means more money and more headaches. Second, certain things tend to go missing on these machines, like the locking backdoor on the head of the machine, where the back glass resides, the coin box, the coin mechanisms and even the keys. To what degree this is complete will dictate how much people want to spend or if they want it at all.

 

The point to all of this isn’t to give you all a free pinball machine purchasing tutorial (you are welcome, though, if you wanted that), but rather to demonstrate the gaps that are present between what AI can reasonably create and what important aspects of the story it is telling will be missing.

Think about it like this: If your mom asked you, “So, how was your day?” and you had AI put something together, it would likely be able to pull info from your calendar to see what events were planned, pull info from the GPS from your phone to add in where you went, include information from your alarms to figure out when you woke up and maybe even pull from your media (texts, social media posts etc.) to explain the ins and outs of the day.

However, how you actually FELT that PARTICULAR day would be more difficult to capture. It might explain that you were 10 minutes late to class, but it wouldn’t be able to explain if that was because you were enjoying 10 more minutes of snuggle time with your significant other or if you were spending 10 minutes in your car sobbing over the breakup you just endured. It could explain that you ordered an Egg McMuffin, hashbrowns and coffee, but not if it tasted good, bad or made you spend five hours in the restroom.

If you broaden this out to letting it take the text of a speech and creating a news story about it, you will likely get a reasonably decent synopsis of what the speaker wrote down and planned to deliver. However, the text on the page isn’t the only thing that matters in a speech. How the audience responded, if the place was full, if people protested and more exist.

For example, I remember a Christian conservative leader who came to Madison to deliver a speech on the issue of “family values,” which included his thoughts on “the gay community” (we didn’t have the whole abbreviation back then). He’d delivered it to a number of other campuses and had relatively little issue: The private, Christian colleges were polite and supportive while the public ones were a little less so, but still functionally decent.

Madison is a place where “two’s company, three’s a protest” and even then, it had a strong, active and vocal gay community. Police were outside dealing with protests, while people were carrying signs and chanting. The supporters of the guy were clashing with the protesters and still having difficulty getting in.

Police had made it clear that anyone who disrupted the speech vocally would be removed. In response, one group handed out pencils with little rainbow flags taped to them, with the instruction to people not to get loud, but rather wave the flag if they disagreed with the guy. At one point, the audience looked like a flutter of rainbow butterflies and the guy just stopped what he was saying and moved on.

This is why it’s important to use AI only to a point and only when it can do what you need it to do in a given situation. In other words, a story based on the speech might tell you what happened at A place where he gave that speech, but not THIS place when he gave the speech.

This means that when you employ AI, consider it a starting point from which you will do some work on the writing instead of letting it do all the work for you. It’s like the latter day version of Wikipedia, in which you can use it to figure out the gist of things, but you don’t want to just copy and paste whatever is there into a file and call it good, lest you end up with a significant problem.

A Question For Media Pros: Is “Deadline” Not A Thing Anymore?

(I was never as rebellious as Spicoli, but have I become Mr. Hand?)

My mom had a friend she worked with on various projects over the years who was always late, usually by a half hour or more. This irritated my mother to no end, as she’s a “I need to be 10 minutes early” person and her friend had no sense of why being late was such a bother.

At one point, the friend asked, “What’s the big deal? Why are you so upset about me being late?” My mom’s answer was a great one:

“When you are late, you are telling me that you value your time more than mine,” Mom said. “If you value our time equally, then you’ll be here on time. In making our plans, you’ve asked me to set aside time for you and this plan you value, time I could otherwise be doing something else that matters to me. Then, when you don’t show up on time, you tell me that the plan, the time and my efforts really don’t matter to you.”

I use this story to try to help students understand why it’s important to show up early, or at least on time, for interviews and meetings with sources. It would really work great, if half the classes I’m teaching these days weren’t too late in showing up to hear it.

The point of this post isn’t to complain about “kids these days” or generally just shout at a cloud, but to really ask a serious question of media practitioners out there:

“Do deadlines matter anymore in our field?”

The goal of every class I teach is to prepare students for what is coming at them when they take a job in the field. That means tighter writing, accuracy of content, fact checking and especially deadlines. In regard to that last one, I try to set fair and yet firm deadlines for their work to be done, which more and more students are having a harder and harder time of making.

Case in point, the intro writing class got a “quotes” assignment on Wednesday. The goal to interview anyone (I literally did not care whom they interviewed, so long as it wasn’t a pet. I let a kid do it once and there were only so many “Meow” quotes I could handle.) and then build about a page-long story based on that interview, relying on the paraphrase-quote pairings we discussed.

I used to set deadlines at noon, but students said that was “confusing” because the LLM system listed it as “12:00 PM” which they took to mean at night. (I’m amazed, but not surprised…) This time, I listed it at “11:30 AM” as I’m assuming in most parts of the country, “AM” means “morning” (although AP style would call it a.m.).

Out of 40 students, 20 made the deadline. Another eight emailed me after the drop box locked at 7 p.m. and they were befuddled by their inability to turn something in.

The syllabus notes that no late assignments will be tolerated, but I decided to take the late ones from the kids who at least emailed. Still, that’s 28/40, a phenomenal team winning percentage in the MLB, about 20 points higher than Shaq’s free-throw percentage in the NBA and ridiculous for making a deadline in my mind.

Deadline used to be the driver of everything we did in media. I still remember once  was working night desk when the story about a kid “clinging to life” became a story of “a kid died.” After I got off the phone with the hospital, my editor came over to my desk, looked at my notes and said, “Oh shit… You have to rewrite Brenda’s story. You have four minutes.”

I thought it was metaphor or hyperbole, but as I was cramming chips into my mouth and scrolling slowly through the story, he returned.

“What the hell are you doing?” he asked. “You have 3 minutes and 30 seconds. The presses are heating up!”

One whirling dervish later, the story was functionally beaten into shape, but I never forgot that four minutes meant four damned minutes.

Even now, deadlines matter to me. I have a giant post-it on the wall for every book I do, reminding me of what has been sent and what needs to go. I was never more embarrassed than the time I missed a deadline because of a misunderstanding between me and my new editor.

I owed four chapters per deadline period, the first of which she said was going to be September. In all my previous interactions with Sage, I got a specific date or just had it due by the end of the month. Right around Labor Day, I got a “Hey, just checking in to see how this is going” email, to which I said things were find and I was about halfway done.

A couple days later, I got another, “Just seeing how you are doing in getting the chapters done” email. Perplexed again, I responded that I was fine, so relax and let me work.

That next week, I got the, “You are past deadline, so we’re kind of concerned we haven’t seen anything yet,” email, which put me on my heels. I tore through all my notes and then immediately called the editor:

Me: My deadline is September. It’s still September. I should have like 17 days left before I’m “late” for anything.

Her: It was due Sept. 1. That’s what I told you.

Me: Um, no, I’ve got everything here and you said, “September” so why would I assume I didn’t have September to work on it.

Her: I always work off the first of any month. That’s always been Sage’s policy.

I was mortified and negotiated another week from her, only to turn the last of the stuff around in four days. When I sent the email with the chapters and an apology for being about 16 days late, she sent me back a reassuring email with this note:

“Don’t worry. Some authors are more than two years past their deadlines…”

How in the hell is that possible, I wondered, only to find out from another friend at Sage that some folks are more than half a decade behind in their deadline pursuit.

Five years?

That’s the gap between birth and kindergarten, the amount of time a four-year degree takes to complete or the length of the worst NFL contract of all time. And the people blowing off a book deadline are likely the same people who are likely to refuse to accept late work from students…

Getting back to the original point, I know that a lot of things change over time in the field in which I teach. We no longer teach “counting beats” to measure headlines or require a pica pole in design classes. We also don’t teach people how to “cut tape” for broadcast, whether that was physically razor-blading something or cutting from Hi-8 tape to Hi-8 tape.

Is deadline one of those things now where being punctual doesn’t matter as much, because we don’t have to worry about press costs? (I imagine television news still has some significant issues if people are blowing stuff off, but I could be wrong.)

Is holding firm on a deadline important to teach a valuable lesson or is it like reminding students to set their clocks back for daylight saving time, a quaint reminder of a generation gap that emphasizes something no longer necessary?

Tell me what you think in general, not accounting for real excuses like last-minute surgery, car accidents or family crises. Those I already have carve outs for. I’m talking about the general and perpetual land of “Oh… Yeah… Can I, like, still turn that in?” situations, where students view deadlines as being as flexible as Silly Putty.

Pros (and profs if you’re interested in chiming in), the phone lines are open and your call is very important to us… Operators are standing by, so tell me what you think.